Mike Bytnar wrote:
>
> Is this a bug or have I misunderstood?
> Why is it possible to say "out recv <iface>"? Or for that matter, "in
> xmit <iface>"?
>
> bridge# ipfw add 500 pipe 2 ip from any to any out recv xl1
> 00500 pipe 5 ip from any to any out recv xl1
if the filter is called from ip_output()
and the packet was received on xl1
(then we must be routing it)
> bridge# ipfw add 600 pipe 3 ip from any to any in xmit xl1
> [ipfw usage displayed]
if we were called from ip_input()
then we have not yet decided if it will be retransmitted from an interface,
let alone which one.. so this makes no sense.
>
> (Using 4.2-STABLE from a week ago.)
>
> Thanks,
> --Mike
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
--
__--_|\ Julian Elischer
/ \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
( OZ ) World tour 2000-2001
---> X_.---._/
v
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message