On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 03:03:28PM +0800, David Xu wrote:
> Linux 2.2 is known slow at TCP/IP throughput,
> but did you test Linux 2.4? it is very different.
> while Linux and FreeBSD are being improved, some guys here
> are still comparing FreeBSD with Linux 2.2, it's unfair, useless
> and waste time. please stop doing such a stupid thing!
Reading your posts is also a "waste of time" and a "stupid thing".
Please stop trolling.
--
Bill Fumerola - security yahoo / Yahoo! inc.
- [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
- Linux Vs. FreeBSD Networking Performance Jonathan Graehl
- Re: Linux Vs. FreeBSD Networking Performance Alfred Perlstein
- Re: Linux Vs. FreeBSD Networking Performance Julian Elischer
- Re: Linux Vs. FreeBSD Networking Performance Jonathan Lemon
- Re: Linux Vs. FreeBSD Networking Performance Rik van Riel
- Re: Linux Vs. FreeBSD Networking Performance David Xu
- Re: Linux Vs. FreeBSD Networking Performance Jonathan Lemon
- Re: Linux Vs. FreeBSD Networking Performance Alan L. Cox
- Re[2]: Linux Vs. FreeBSD Networking Performance David Xu
- Re: Linux Vs. FreeBSD Networking Performance Alan L. Cox
- Re: Linux Vs. FreeBSD Networking Performance Bill Fumerola
- Re: Linux Vs. FreeBSD Networking Performance Ashutosh S. Rajekar
- Re: Linux Vs. FreeBSD Networking Performance Steve Shah
- RE: Linux Vs. FreeBSD Networking Performance Jonathan Graehl
- Re: Linux Vs. FreeBSD Networking Performance Alan L. Cox
- Re: Linux Vs. FreeBSD Networking Performance Michael C . Wu
- Re: Linux Vs. FreeBSD Networking Performance Rik van Riel
- Re: Linux Vs. FreeBSD Networking Performance Jeremiah Gowdy
