>Please note that the ip6protosw is ALSO very broken unfortunately, you are wrong. yes, protosw is supposed to be protocol-independent. however, due to the nature of IPv6 extension headers (you can have infinite number of them) you can blow the kernel stack very easily. therefore, we had to do ip6protosw.h. please read my Usenix paper (on m_pulldown and mbuf issues in BSD IPv6 support) two years ago. itojun To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
- Re: IPV6/KAME/protosw integration cleanup Robert Watson
- Re: IPV6/KAME/protosw integration cleanup Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
- Re: IPV6/KAME/protosw integration cleanup JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
- Re: IPV6/KAME/protosw integration cleanup Julian Elischer
- Re: IPV6/KAME/protosw integration cleanup Julian Elischer
- Re: IPV6/KAME/protosw integration clea... Keiichi SHIMA
- Re: IPV6/KAME/protosw integration clea... JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
- Re: IPV6/KAME/protosw integration cleanup Julian Elischer
- Re: IPV6/KAME/protosw integration clea... Robert Watson
- Re: IPV6/KAME/protosw integration cleanup Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
- Re: IPV6/KAME/protosw integration clea... Julian Elischer
- Re: IPV6/KAME/protosw integration cleanup Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
- Re: IPV6/KAME/protosw integration cleanup Julian Elischer
- Re: IPV6/KAME/protosw integration cleanup Bruce Evans
- Re: IPV6/KAME/protosw integration cleanup Garrett Wollman
- Re: IPV6/KAME/protosw integration clea... Julian Elischer
- Re: IPV6/KAME/protosw integration cleanup Julian Elischer
- Re: IPV6/KAME/protosw integration clea... Bruce Evans
- Re: IPV6/KAME/protosw integration cleanup Keiichi SHIMA
- Re: IPV6/KAME/protosw integration cleanup Julian Elischer