On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 01:39:41PM -0800, Michael Loftis wrote:
> "Crist J. Clark" wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 05:33:39AM -0800, Michael Loftis wrote:
> > > I'm running natd and I need to change it's behaviour slightly.  it seems
> > > that if it doesn't find a redirect_address match it'll drop connection
> > > requests for that address, so putting it in a simplest-case divert from
> > > any to any type of ipfw rulle severly breaks things.  What I need it to
> > > do is pass those through unmodified.
> > >
> > > Can I get it to do this or am I going to have to get specific with my
> > > ipfw rules?
> >
> > If I understand what you are saying, it should be doing this
> > already. That is, natd(8) passes through anything it does not modify
> > untouched. It does not drop (any normal) packets.
> 
> already established sesions transit fine, but new sessions (specifically what
> I'm inerested in are new sessions to the local machine) to anything other than
> the configured redirect_* stanzas get dropped.  ipfw is not the culprit, natd
> in verbose mode makes note of the fact that it is dropping these packets.

Could we see this?

> BAsically the only problem I'm having is with setup (SYN set apparently)
> packets sent through natd, if they don't match up witha  redirect rule they
> get silently dropped.

I thought you just said it was saying it was doing this in verbose
mode?

> Don't say thats not it's behavior, because that is precisely what it is doing.
> 
> my natd config is as follows...
> 
> unregistered_only
> same_ports
> dynamic
> interface vlan5
> 
> redirect_address 192.168.0.2 64.71.178.211
> 
> the only active ipfw rule is as follows
> add divert natd all from any to any via vlan5
> 
> Topology is simple, external on vlan5 interface (physically fxp0) and internal
> on vlan0 interface (physically fxp1)  -- traffic transits fine the upstream
> swithc fully supports vlans via 802.1Q  and I have not yet identified any
> problems there (traffic passes to and from the host and itnerfaces just as
> configured).  So the vlan ifaces are acting just like a normal ethernet dev.
> It's natd thats being funkified.

Might be some weird vlan(4)-natd(8) interaction, but I can't say.
-- 
Crist J. Clark                     |     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                                   |     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://people.freebsd.org/~cjc/    |     [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message

Reply via email to