On 11 Jul, Wes Peters wrote:
> What we observed on our embedded system is the packet gets sent on all > attached interfaces, with dest IP 255.255.255.255, and a src IP of the > local address that has the default route. If there isn't a default > route, sending to 255.255.255.255 fails with "no route to host." > > This is bogus, so I propose to change it to a special case, where > packets sent to 255.255.255.255 will be sent on each attached > interface, with src IP of the interface "primary" address. Does this > sound reasonable? Should it work without a default route? (I think it > should, the special case of the all-call broadcast shouldn't even go > into rtalloc.) This sounds good. I think it should work without a default route. _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"