I noticed that if I do this:- # route add -net 224.0.0.0/4 -iface xl0 -expire 3000
The resultant cloned routes don't get given a lifetime, i.e. they're totally static and remain in the route table for the lifetime of the kernel. Either multicast designated receivers or IGMP aware routers are the two possible deployment scenarios I can think of which might want to hold on to multicast routes for a long period of time - but these same machines will probably be running mrouted, rather than using a simple primary-interface technique as above to leverage link-layer multicast. What's to stop a malicious user from writing a program which fills the routing table up with multicast routes which aren't actually used by the box? Would it not be a good idea to age these routes and thus prevent them from polluting the routing table in this case? BMS _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
