Are the two actually the same protocol? Or is Microsoft's a case of "embrace and extend?" Why do they use different port numbers? (The idea of having multiple port numbers for port mapping seems to defeat the very purpose of having a mapping service in the first place.)
Also, I'm looking for examples of firewalls that monitor traffic to and from an RPC server to determine what traffic to allow through. (They obviously have to do this, since one can't rely on "well known" ports.) --Brett Glass At 09:05 AM 8/6/2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >111 is Sun-RPC >135 is MS-RPC _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
