On Sun, 08 Aug 2004 13:01:00 -0400, Mike Tancsa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 21:14:33 -0700, in sentex.lists.freebsd.net you
> wrote:
>
> >Mike Tancsa wrote:
> >
> >>On Sat, 24 Jul 2004 20:42:01 -0700, in sentex.lists.freebsd.net you
> >>wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>>>Seriously though, mine was a very ugly hack to
> >>>>>get things working again for me. Most of the DSL aggregators here
> >>>>>are Juniper ERXes which do not play nice with FreeBSD's PPPoE.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>any thoughts as to why?
> >>>
> >>>FreeBSD's pppoe is going through a little development at the moment..
> >>>Now would be a good time to get it fixed..
> >>Hi,
> >>Simple LCP echos work just fine, but when using LQR things "break".
> >>There are debug logs posted in the archives when I first figured out
> >>what was broken. If you need another copy I am happy to post again.
> >>
> >
> >certainly it would be useful. rather than taking potsots at the archive
> >hoping to catch it..
> >
> >pppoe is tricky because the responsibility for errors os split between
> >the pppoe module
> > and the ppp module..
>
>
> Just to followup for the archives sake, the latest LQR changes do not
> fix the ppp/PPPoE problem with respect to the issue below. I have a
> full TCPDUMP as well as ppp debug logs that illustrate the problem for
> anyone interested.
>
> ---Mike
And for the archive's sake... ppp has now grown an ``enable echo''
command (in -current).
--
Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://www.Awfulhak.org> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour !
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
