On Tue, 11 Apr 2006 17:59:50 +0400 dima <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 11:26:40PM +0400, dima wrote: > > > 3. Is at least implementation of NFS client (either kernel-side or > > > user-space) stable enough for production use? Client OS > > > replacement is impossible (hardly suitable, really) in my project. > > > > I built a big mail/web cluster a few years ago using FreeBSD 4.x > > (4.6.2 I think), where all the front-ends used NFS to access data > > on a shared fileserver platform (NetApp). It worked without a > > hitch, and still does. > > What is the reaction on network/NAS failure? > I mean, I'm about to provide transparent storage service in the case > of failures of different types.
Not sure about currently, but it use to have a problem with if there was a failure, it would go into a wait state forever. I've not run into this in a very long time and this was suppose to have been fixed a month or two ago. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
