On Monday 12 June 2006 02:57 pm, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote: > Vadim Goncharov wrote: > > I hope that my explanation was helpful enough to understand :) > > Also, if you will be using 7.0, include BPF_JITTER in your kernel > > config as this will enable native code-compiling for bpf and > > ng_bpf - this will speed things up. > > Am I the only one, that thinks BPF_JITTER is a stupid name? It > suggest you add or enable jitter for the packet flow. No one wants > jitter! It sucks. Why isn't it called simply BPF_JIT? Everyone > knows what JIT stands for, JITTER on the other hand is to be > avoided.
I am the guilty one and I hate the name myself. :-) This feature was imported from WinPcap: http://www.winpcap.org/docs/docs31/html/group__NPF__code.html#ga33 I didn't want another name for the same thing. Jung-uk Kim _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
