Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 06:16:05PM +0100, Josef Karthauser wrote:
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 05:00:58PM +0200, Phil Regnauld wrote:
Dmitry Morozovsky (marck) writes:
I suppose pinging pjd@ did not work? ;)
Good question -- why did Pawel not commit them himself if he could ? :)
No idea. I sent him an email asking on 28 Jun 2006, but I've not had a
reply.
Sorry guys for the delay.
I answer this very question too many time... :)
There are few reason:
- From what I remember there were still some small issues in those
patch, but I know people are using them in production with success, so
maybe there are already gone or those issues don't exist for their
workload.
- What I'd really like to see in the tree is vimage or per-jail network
virtual interface or something, where one can bind selected IP
addresses to.
I proposed this at BSDCan earlier this year and have found a way to
implement it in a pretty clean way, however PHK was against it in general
because it would make jails 'too heavyweight'.
- Currently Bjoern Zeeb is working on those patches and IPv6 for jails,
so he is the right person to ask the question.
PS. I'm CCing it.
--
Andre
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
