Randy Bush wrote:
divert
ipnat
ipfw's integrated nat
I believe the integrated version makes configuration simpler. I would
choose the old classic divert with ipfw if it is for a important network
that must work, but if I was running -current I would try the integrated
variant beacuse it seems to be simpler to use.
you seem to imply that you have reason to suspect that ipfw integrated
nat might not be reliable, or at least not as reliable as divert+natd.
any particular experiences or gossip to tell?
No, like I said I only have experience with divert, but in my opinion
it's best to not use the latest software for things that *must* work and
the integrated nat is a new thing and only available for -current.
However it's based on something that been around for a while, libalias,
so I guess it's stable.
I'm planning on trying to use ipnat with ipfw on freebsd 6.2 because I
think that's simpler than divert and has been around for a while.
But again if I was running a system based on -current I would go for the
integrated variant.
--
Christer Hermansson
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
