+1 on increasing the threshold, 1024 is way too low.
Also consider the folk who depend on the existing behaviour: a
predictable ephemeral port range is useful, if for some reason you need
to apply a NAT policy to that traffic, with no other knowledge about how
the applications you must NAT actually behave.
later
BMS
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
