On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 12:42 PM, Ivan Voras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bartosz Giza wrote: > >> Another question is why em0 taskq is eating so much cpu ? BGE interface is >> actually one that pushes 2 times more packets than em0 and it uses about >> half cpu comparing to em0. Is that not strange ? >> Could someone tell my why is this happening ? BGE is faster ? or maybe i can >> tune some > > I have the same problem - em0 taskq eating incredible amounts of CPU. If > you find a solution, contact me! > > >
Could this be related to the different interrupt handling models? em(4) uses FILTER, the others use ITHREAD. -- ~/.signature: no such file or directory _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
