On 2008-Dec-27 14:54:34 -0800, Julian Elischer <jul...@elischer.org> wrote: >Qing Li wrote: >> I believe examining the impacts of RTF_LLINFO on the ports >> was a good exercise even if we have to rejuvenate it. > >reintroduce it with value 0
And a comment indicating that the definition of RTF_LLINFO is solely for backward compatibility. (To make it clear why it's never referenced in the base system and not needed for new code). -- Peter Jeremy Please excuse any delays as the result of my ISP's inability to implement an MTA that is either RFC2821-compliant or matches their claimed behaviour.
pgpJOC5kHzF5N.pgp
Description: PGP signature
