net@ -
A short patch attached that requires 3 paragraphs of explanation.
We found an issue in TCP when the a client connects to our server,
establishes a connection, reboots and chooses the same source port to
re-establish the connection. This isn't hard from other vendors'
clients. On Solaris, the same NFS mount order at boot time will
frequently result in source port re-use for the NFS connections. In
this case, the customer was seeing mounts hang until the keepalive on
our side would kick the established connection.
The problem in the code is probably best explained using the patch
itself:
---
Index: sys/netinet/tcp_input.c
===================================================================
--- sys/netinet/tcp_input.c (revision xxxx)
+++ sys/netinet/tcp_input.c (working copy)
@@ -1818,7 +1818,11 @@ tcp_do_segment(struct mbuf *m, struct tc
todrop = tp->rcv_nxt - th->th_seq;
if (todrop > 0) {
- if (thflags & TH_SYN) {
+ /*
+ * If this is a duplicate SYN for our current connection,
+ * advance over it and pretend and it's not a SYN.
+ */
+ if (thflags & TH_SYN && th->th_seq == tp->irs) {
thflags &= ~TH_SYN;
th->th_seq++;
if (th->th_urp > 1)
---
The problem is that when our TCP stack gets a SYN packet for a
connection that's already in ESTABLISHED state, it runs through the
above code. The above code is basically noticing that the packet is
coming in left of the receive window and then saying "Ah, a SYN! This
must be a duplicate SYN for our existing connect." After that, it just
turns off SYN and treats it as a normal packet (after advancing past
the SYN seq number). The code is broken, though: the only condition
under which this is a duplicate SYN is if the th_seq matches the irs,
the initial receive sequence.
After correcting the above, any SYN that doesn't exactly match the
initial sequence number results in a RST|ACK response and the
ESTABLISHED connection being dropped. Before this change, this is also
what happened if a SYN arrived within or past the window, so I'm
basically making the before-window behavior match the other
behavior. I tested this using telnet to establish a TCP connection and
raw packet injection to throw SYNs at it.
Comments?
--
Zach Loafman | Staff Engineer | Isilon Systems
--- a/sys/netinet/tcp_input.c
+++ b/sys/netinet/tcp_input.c
@@ -1818,7 +1818,11 @@ tcp_do_segment(struct mbuf *m, struct tcphdr *th, struct socket *so,
todrop = tp->rcv_nxt - th->th_seq;
if (todrop > 0) {
- if (thflags & TH_SYN) {
+ /*
+ * If this is a duplicate SYN for our current connection,
+ * advance over it and pretend and it's not a SYN.
+ */
+ if (thflags & TH_SYN && th->th_seq == tp->irs) {
thflags &= ~TH_SYN;
th->th_seq++;
if (th->th_urp > 1)
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
