2009/12/10 Doug Barton <do...@freebsd.org>: > Richard A Steenbergen wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I just noticed, while trying to do a little debugging, that ping6 >> doesn't seem to have a way to specify "do not fragment" like ping does >> for IPv4. Obviously the way this is implemented has been changed, since >> there is no longer a DF-bit in IPv6, but it looks like there is already >> an IPV6_DONTFRAG setsockopt() available for exactly this purpose. It >> looks like IPV6_DONTFRAG got added at a later date (from RFC3542), >> perhaps after ping6 was initially written. >> >> It seems like the correct fix would be to add a cli option to ping6 >> (perhaps 'D', since it's available and matches the command in ping) to >> call this setsockopt() and implement a "do not fragment" option. >> > > Sounds good, we look forward to reviewing your patches. :) >
Sure, there might be compatibility issues in between KAME or something else.. -- wbr, pluknet
ping6.nofrag.patch
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
