On 26 January 2011 02:32, Alexander Zagrebin <a...@zagrebin.ru> wrote: > Hi! > > I've found some issues with the if_bridge on 8.2-PRERELEASE. > > 1. An ARP issue > > Suppose we have a box with the 4 interfaces: nic0, nic1, nic2, nic3. > The interfaces are linked pairwise using 2 bridge(4) interfaces: bridge0 > and bridge1. Only nic0 has an IP address assigned (for example, > 192.168.0.1/24). > So we have configuration like this: > > 192.168.0.1 > ---nic0---+ +---nic2--- > | | > bridge0 bridge1 > | | > ---nic1---+ +---nic3--- > > The problem: when ARP query about MAC address of 192.168.0.1 is received > on the nic2 or nic3, then system responds with the MAC address of the nic0, > though networks on the bridge0 and bridge1 are completely independent. > IMHO, it isn't correct. > > The reason is in ARP handling code: it looks for an address of the interface > belonging to a bridge, but there is not check that a bridge is the same. > > Attached patch (patch-if_ether.c) fixes the issue.
I have committed this, thanks. _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
