On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 02:54:11PM +0700, Rashid N. Achilov wrote: > When I try to ping local interface - ping missed! When I try to ping this > interface with -S key (specified the same address) - working. What's a bug? > In RELENG_7 worked. > > local interface on box: > em0: flags=8943<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu > 1500 > options=219b<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,VLAN_HWCSUM,TSO4,WOL_MAGIC> > ether 00:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx > inet 192.168.1.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255 > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX <full-duplex>) > status: active > > ping ordinary: > master:[root] 105>ping 192.168.1.1 > PING 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1): 56 data bytes > ^C > --- 192.168.1.1 ping statistics --- > 2 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100.0% packet loss > > ping with -S key: > master:[root] 106>ping -S 192.168.1.1 192.168.1.1 > PING 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) from 192.168.1.1: 56 data bytes > 64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.022 ms > 64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.030 ms > ^C > --- 192.168.1.1 ping statistics --- > 2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0.0% packet loss > round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.022/0.026/0.030/0.004 ms > > master:[root] 103>uname -a > FreeBSD master.askd.ru 8.2-STABLE FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #1: Fri Jul 15 18:23:18 > NOVST 2011 [email protected]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/Master i386 > > What's a terrible? I'm understand, that ping "itself" is rarely situation, > but > it worked in 7.x!
What happens if you "route delete 192.168.1.1" and then try the ping without using -S? -- Brian Somers <[email protected]> Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour ! <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
