On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 07:36, Ryan Stone <[email protected]> wrote: > 2011/10/19 <[email protected]>: >> This may be a wrong configuration or QinQ: packet may have M_VLAN tag is >> set and still vlan-tagged (ether_type = VLAN) > > It is not QinQ in my case. The interface that the upper hook exports > is that you send it a valid ethernet frame and it passes that frame up > the stack. A vlan-tagged frame is a valid frame so I don't see why it > should not be handled correctly.
Why should the requirements for the Netgraph path be any different to the non-Netgraph path? If drivers must ensure that frames that reach ether_demux have had their VLAN tags stripped, so should Netgraph things that act like drivers. So why don't you move that logic into ether_demux from the ether_input path, or have Netgraph use the ether_input path? _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
