On 20 September 2012 20:48, Gleb Smirnoff <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi! > > On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 08:37:19PM +1200, Andrew Thompson wrote: > A> > Yet another patch to test. Was suprising to me that lagg(4), which > A> > aims at high-performance, still utilizes if_start. > A> > > A> > Attached is patch that converts lagg(4) to use if_transmit. I'd > A> > appreciate if someone who do use lagg(4) tests the patch. If anyone > A> > benchmarks lagg(4) with and w/o patch that will be most appreciated. > A> > A> Sean Bruno has already tested this patch at Yahoo, I have just been > A> delayed in committing it. There are just a few small differences so we > A> can commit one or merge. > > Also fabient@ replied to me in private with this patch :) > > Hmm, I've missed stats update. I have merge statistics updates from your patch > to mine and here it is attached.
Looks good, please commit. There is just a stray `i` here +static int lagg_transmit(struct ifnet *i, struct mbuf *); Andrew _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
