On Tuesday, February 19, 2013 9:37:54 pm Sepherosa Ziehau wrote: > John, > > I came across this draft several days ago, you may be interested: > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tcpm-newcwv-00
Yes, that is extremely relevant. My application does use its own rate-limiting. And now that I've read this in full, this does seem to very much be what I want and is a better solution than ignoring idle handling entirely. Ironic that this was posted a few weeks after my patch. :) Clearly this is not an isolated workflow. -- John Baldwin _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"