On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Bill Yuan <[email protected]> wrote:
> 1. "each table can have it's own name", I like this idea. I am also > working on this kind of functions, But I am in different way. In my > opinion. the "name" or "type" of the table, all this are utility function > for the user. in the kernel space. I want to keep all the things the same > as before. and add a translate function in the user land commands, so that > means we need to find a space to keep the mapping of the name<->id or > type<->id, > this does not work, you'd have another database to keep in sync and on which you have races with modifications to the ipfw config. cheers luigi _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
