> On 12 Aug 2016, at 00:52, Adrian Chadd <adrian.ch...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Which ones of these hit the line rate comfortably?
So Adrian, I ran tests again using FreeBSD 11-RC1. I put iperf throughput in result files (so that we can classify them), as well as top -P ALL and pcm-memory.x. iperf results : columns 3&4 are for srv1->srv2, columns 5&6 are for srv2->srv1 (both flows running at the same time). Results, expected throughput (best first) : 11, 01, 05, 07, 06 Results, bad (best first) : 04, 02, 09, 03 Results, worst (best first) : 10, 08 00) Idle system http://pastebin.com/raw/K1iMVHVF 01) No pinning http://pastebin.com/raw/7J3HibX0 02) numactl -l fixed-domain-rr -m 0 -c 0 http://pastebin.com/raw/Yt7yYr0K 03) numactl -l fixed-domain-rr -m 0 -c 0 + cpuset -l <0-11> -x <IRQ> http://pastebin.com/raw/1FAgDUSU 04) numactl -l fixed-domain-rr -m 0 -c 0 + cpuset -l <12-23> -x <IRQ> http://pastebin.com/raw/fTAxrzBb 05) numactl -l fixed-domain-rr -m 1 -c 1 http://pastebin.com/raw/kuAHzKu2 06) numactl -l fixed-domain-rr -m 1 -c 1 + cpuset -l <0-11> -x <IRQ> http://pastebin.com/raw/tgtaZgwb 07) numactl -l fixed-domain-rr -m 1 -c 1 + cpuset -l <12-23> -x <IRQ> http://pastebin.com/raw/16ReuGFF 08) No pinning, default kernel (no NUMA option) http://pastebin.com/raw/Ah74fKRx 09) default kernel (no NUMA option) + cpuset -l <0-11> + cpuset -l <0-11> -x <IRQ> http://pastebin.com/raw/YE0PxEu8 10) default kernel (no NUMA option) + cpuset -l <12-23> + cpuset -l <12-23> -x <IRQ> http://pastebin.com/raw/RPh8aM49 11) No pinning, default kernel (no NUMA option), NUMA BIOS disabled http://pastebin.com/raw/LyGcLKDd Ben _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
