https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=143622
Kristof Provost <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #5 from Kristof Provost <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Max Laier from comment #2) While rmlocks are relatively lightweight there is still a non-zero overhead. For the purposes of a test the lock can simply be removed, and without it I see ~2% more packets per second in pf than with it. I've been thinking about replacing it with a CK_LIST and epoch based cleanup, but I stopped working on it when I spotted that ipfw relies on the lock. It should be possible to move that into ipfw, but I'm not sure the 2% is worth that work. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
