Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Eric Anderson writes:
Don't mean to be terse here, but I'm talking about the same test done an
two different RAID5 configurations, with different disks, and not just
me - other users in this very thread see the same issue..
Uhm, if you are using RAID5 and your requests are not aligned and
sized after the RAID5 you should *expect* read performance to be poor.
If you your request ends up accessing two different blocks even just
once per stripe, this totally kills performance.
My tests were using RAID10 and just striping. (RAID0 might be the right
name for it)
Pete
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"