István wrote: > I guess it is not only for netpipe, it is doing a pretty decent job changing > the packet size checking the performance so finally you have an overview > about the size, lag, bw > > I like! :) > > On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Adrian Chadd <[email protected]> wrote: > >> 2009/10/16 István <[email protected]>: >>> I see. >>> It shows that linux default setup is better. >> .. being completely correct, it shows the linux default setup _for >> netpipe_ is better on that particular hardware. >> >> That identifies a few other variables which may need addressing. :) >> >> >> Adrian >> > > >
And maybe the wise can send out word of doing well on FreeBSD, so we can choose a better setup with looking forward repeating the test under 'tuned' conditions? I'm willing to perform some tests within the next 4 weeks when our server hardware (Dell PowerEdge 1950-III with two if_bge() NICs and 16GB RAM) changes OS from FreeBSD 8.0 to RedHat Linux. In a time-window of about a week I might be capable of testing FreeBSD 8.0 as it would be that time by the mid of November with a setup of Linux (distro doesn't matter as I can choose). I need to know WHAT, WHERE and HOW. Thanks. oh _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
