outperform at what?
adrian On 28 May 2013 00:08, O. Hartmann <[email protected]> wrote: > Phoronix has emitted another of its "famous" performance tests > comparing different flavours of Linux (their obvious favorite OS): > > http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=bsd_linux_8way&num=1 > > It is "impressive, too, to see that PHORONIX did not benchmark the > gaming performance - this is done exclusively on the Linux > distributions, I guess in the lack of suitable graphics cards at > Phronix (although it should be possible to compare the nVidia BLOB > performance between each system). > > Although I'm not much impressed by the way the benchmarks are > orchestrated, Phoronix is the only platform known to me providing those > from time to time benchmarks on most recent available operating systems. > > Also, the bad performance of ZFS compared to to UFS2 seems to have a > very harsh impact on systems were that memory- and performance-hog ZFS > isn't really needed. > > Surprised and really disappointing (especially for me personally) is > the worse performance of the Rodinia benchmark on the BSDs, for what I > try to have deeper look inside to understand the circumstances of the > setups and what this scientific benchmark is supposed to do and > measure. > > But the overall conclusion shown on Phoronix is that what I see at our > department which utilizes some Linux flavours, Ubuntu 12.01 or Suse and > in a majority CentOS (older versions), which all outperform the several > FreeBSd servers I maintain (FreeBSD 9.1-STABLE and FreeBSD > 10.0-CURRENT, so to end software compared to some older Linux kernels). > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]" _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
