Dear David, Thank you for your reply. After sending my question to ML, I have found that I did not write "pass .... queue ... " on /etc/pf.conf. I had written the port definitions for queue in /etc/services instead of /etc/pf.conf. As it is Sunday today, I will try your suggestion tomorrow.
Regards, Hideki Yamamoto From: David Pierron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: if_bridge + altq (CBQ) Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 08:27:26 -0500 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Hideki Yamamoto on 12/10/2005 5:39 PM wrote: > > >I am trying the packect shaping by CBQ of altq on FBSD6 box. The box is > >configured as bridge by if_bridge kernel configuration. The target packet > >is UDP on IPv6. Though I wrote output port number of the udp packet on > >/etc/services and wrote CBQ shaping rule on /etc/pf.conf, the shaping rule > >about each port number are not applied to the packet, so only default rule > >are applied. > > > >My question is: can pf especially altq work with bridge function? If so, > >which bridge function, BRIDGE, if_bridge, ng_brige, is OK? > > > I am running if_bridge on FBSD 6.0 and have successfully run CBQ and > HFSC on the bridge ... > > Do you have: > > net.link.bridge.pfil_member=1 # enables packet filtering on in and out > interfaces > > specified in /etc/sysctl.conf? It's quite possible this is necessary for > ALTQ to access the "out" on the $xx_if of the bridge ... > > Keep in mind that if you use the queue on a "pass" rule, ALTQ will apply to > the "out" of that rule ... > > HTH > > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
