On Thursday 24 August 2006 20:01, Frank Steinborn wrote: > Max Laier wrote: > > [please do not cut the audit trail from your replys - it really helps > > to have all information in one email] > > > > Short recap for everybody: Using pf stateful rules for inet6 fails > > for connections originating from the firewall itself to a service > > running on the same box. Culprit seems to be interface selection in > > inet6 (switching between the interface that has the address > > configured and lo0). See below. > > Something new on that? I searched for a PR, and couldn't fine one > so i just wanted to ask. > > I could file a PR if neccessary.
Please do and let me know the PR#. I almost forgot, but will look at it over the weekend as I find time. Thanks for the reminder. -- /"\ Best regards, | [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News
pgpf69K4w9aq8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
