On Friday 08 September 2006 16:56, Mircea Popescu wrote:
> I have an Freebsd 6.0 box with a functioning bridge (bridge0 = fxp0 +
> rl0)
>
> My problem is that if I try to cut access to any port on bridge0
> interface using PF, nothing happens.
>
> For example I've tried to cut access to ssh service from a certain ip
> ... putty still managed to get through.
>
> The rule was:
> block on bridge0 proto { tcp udp } from yy.yy.yy.yy to xx.xx.xx.xx port
> pppppp
>
> BUT, with the following rule:
> block on rl0 proto { tcp udp } from yy.yy.yy.yy to xx.xx.xx.xx. port
> pppppp
>
> Putty couldn't obtain a connection.I suggest that you read the if_bridge(4) manual page, which talks extensively about packet filtering options. > Considering the fact that in linux, which I gave up using, making a > bridge would disable the interfaces within, I WOULD LIKE TO HAVE SOME > QUESTIONS ANSWERED: > > 1. Once the bridge0 interface is created, the fxp0 and rl0 interfaces > could still get their own ip addresses? (in linux this would be > imposible) You can either assign an IP to the interface or to the bridge itself, iirc. > 2. Which firewall it is more desirable to use with a bridge? PF or > IPFW) The one you understand best and like the most. -- /"\ Best regards, | [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News
pgpStmzlKXfK0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
