[email protected] wrote:
On February 23, 2010 at 10:11 AM "Ermal Luçi" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 6:14 PM, Julian Elischer
<[email protected]>wrote:
>
> > Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> >
> >> On Sun, 21 Feb 2010, Julian Elischer wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Jim Sifferle wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> Does any FreeBSD branch / vimage release combination support
separate pf
> >>>> AND ipfw configurations per jail? I need ipfw+pf/altq for HFSC
queuing
> >>>
> >>> -current (9) should be close, with patches for pf supplied by ceri.
> >>
> >> s,ceri,eri, (Ermal Luçi)
> >
> > it'd be nice if itcould get committed
> >
> > Ermal, is it ready?
> >
> It is usable look at http://svn.freebsd.org/base/user/eri/pf45/head/.
> For vnet pfsync/pflow/pflog needs some fixes still.
>
I just now had some time to put together a CURRENT box for testing. I'm
getting a 'Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode' whenever I
boot with pf_enable set to YES in rc.conf. Here's my current setup:
- FreeBSD CURRENT cvs snapshot as of 2/25/10, running AMD64 kernel
- GENERIC kernel compiled with ALTQ and VIMAGE options, invariants and
witness options disabled, plus Imunes patch for FreeBSD 8 RC3 available
here: http://imunes.net/imunes-8.0-RC3.diff
- pf loaded as module with very simple pass all pf.conf
- ipfw not loaded
The Fatal trap seems to occur when pfctl is run.
This is unfortunately one for Ermal, as I wouldn't know a pfctl
command if it came up and kicked me in the shins. :-)
We really should try get the new pf stuff into -current so that
it gets more testing.
I am recompiling my kernel with all debugging options turned on.
Hopefully I can get a good kernel dump. I will also try with fresh
kernel sources skipping the Imunes patch. Anything else I should try?
Thanks for your help,
Jim
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
