Interesting. I feel like the performance is degraded quite a bit between
two VPN points that display these messages vs. two VPN points that don't
display these messages, though I could be wrong. Is your basic
suggestion to not consider this a concern and continue forward with my
VPN rollouts?
On 1/12/2012 3:23 PM, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On 12. Jan 2012, at 21:07 , Matt Lager wrote:
I've had a bug report in on this for a while but hasn't received a response
yet, also posted to the FreeBSD forums and haven't received a response either,
see these links:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/163208
http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=28278
I don't believe it to be a configuration issue, and this is really preventing
me from using FreeBSD 9.0 as VPN endpoints. If anyone has any information on
this, I would greatly appreciate it.
yeah it's the re-use of an mbuf that previously passed through pf. The logging
is noise basically though can be painful with a slow (serial) console. I have
a sysctl locally to disable the logging, OpenBSD has removed the printf by now.
I agree that we need to fix these places where it still originates and even if
it's for documentation purposes to eventually decide if re-using the mbuf there
is really cheaper to allocating a new one as other people lately found
transporting other properties along with the mbuf and re-using that can lead to
odd results.
/bz
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
