On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Derek (freebsd lists) < [email protected]> wrote:
> Hi! > > I'm trying to configure a basic layer-3 load balancer (10.2-RELEASE). I > initially started down this path with relayd from ports, as it seems to do > what I need, very succinctly. > > What I've stumbled upon - I hope - is me not knowing how to cause rdr > statements in anchors to be evaluated, although it appears that this > functionality is currently broken. > > Take this contrived, most-trivial example (where 192.168.0.1 is external, > and 10.2.2.251 is internal): > > /etc/pf.conf: > rdr inet proto tcp from any to 192.168.0.1 port http -> 10.2.2.251 > > sudo pfctl -Fa -f /etc/pf.conf > > *everything works as expected* > > Now, this time using anchors: > > sudo mv /etc/pf.conf /etc/pf.conf-anchor > > /etc/pf.conf: > anchor testing > rdr rules must be in a "rdr-anchor". "anchor" is for filter rules. load anchor testing from "/etc/pf.conf-anchor" > > sudo pfctl -Fa -f /etc/pf.conf > > gives TCP RSTs when connecting to port 80. Additionally > > sudo pfctl -a testing -vvs nat: > @0 rdr inet proto tcp from any to 192.168.0.1 port = http -> 10.2.2.251 > [ Evaluations: 0 Packets: 0 Bytes: 0 States: 0 ] > [ Inserted: uid 0 pid 56764 State Creations: 0 ] > > > So identical rulesets, one loaded as an anchor: never evaluated, the other > loaded into the main ruleset directly: works fine. > > Is this broken, or am I missing something? > > Thanks! > Derek > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]" > _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
