On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 01:02:55PM -0500, Garrett Wollman wrote: > <<On Fri, 4 Mar 2016 01:09:49 +0000, Glen Barber <[email protected]> said: > > >> I'm not convinced that it makes > >> much sense to have all the different -lib32-* variants given the > >> normal use case is runtime-only. > > > For those who have no need for lib32 stuff, we do not want to enforce > > its existence. > > You may have missed my point: I was suggesting that the lib32 stuff be > packed into fewer packages, because the places where it is needed are > less likely to want fine-grained selection. So just having a single > package with all the "runtime" packages would be closer to what most > people needed (and likewise for the "development" etc. libraries which > are almost never useful). >
You're right, I did miss your point. I see what you mean now. It's not impossible to do, but will require a bit of tweaking to the script that generates the metadata files. Thank you for the suggestion. Glen
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
