> On Apr 26, 2016, at 16:53, Glen Barber <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 03:47:14PM -0400, Kris Moore wrote: >> On 04/26/16 03:40 PM, Renato Botelho wrote: >>>> On Apr 26, 2016, at 14:54, Kris Moore <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> So, we're in the process of moving to package base for PC-BSD -CURRENT >>>> images next month. The only real nit I'm seeing so far is that each >>>> package has a origin of 'base'. Shouldn't that be unique for each >>>> package? I.E. base/FreeBSD-<foo> >>> Hi Kris, >>> >>> We are working to move pfSense 2.4 development snapshots to 11 with base >>> package as well >>> >>> How are you dealing with files installed by distrib* targets? (/etc/rc, >>> /etc/master.passwd, …) >>> >> >> I've looked at a kludge to ship those bits as another .txz. Did you have >> another method, or is this something we can expect fixed properly as a >> package, I.E. FreeBSD-distrib-FOO.txz >> > > One (other kludge) I was considering was automatically invoking > etcupdate(8) on 'FreeBSD-runtime' installation, which should > automatically populate /etc on a clean install, as well as keeping /etc > updated as part of upgrades. > > But, I *really* do not like that idea...
That was the only idea I had too. Why don’t you like it? -- Renato Botelho
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
