Hello, I was wondering if someone could comment on the status of package building for 6-stable.
A look at pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/ shows: Build logs (errors and otherwise) Last full run on 6.x-current [i386 ([an error occurred while processing this directive])] Current run on 6.x-current [i386 (2006-07-25 05:29)] Last full run on 6.x-stable with experimental port patches [i386 (2006-07-28 22:57)] Current run on 6.x-stable with experimental port patches [i386 (2006-08-04 10:29)] If I take a port like archivers/zip as an example, www.freshports.org/archivers/zip shows the port was upgraded to 2.32 on 7 July 2006. Looking at pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-6-latest-logs/zip-2.31.log.bz2 I see build started at Wed Jun 21 23:20:01 UTC 2006 which might explain why 2.31 is the newest port on the FTP servers: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6-stable/All/zip-2.31.tbz If I look at the "experimental" logs, however, I see 2.32 has been building. pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-6-exp-latest-logs/zip-2.32.log shows: building zip-2.32 on gohan37.freebsd.org ... build started at Sat Jul 29 07:51:57 UTC 2006 In fact, I can find the package here: pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-6-packages-latest/archivers/zip-2.32.tbz If the port is building, why does it not appear on the FTP servers? This is just one concrete example, not a specific problem with one port. Thank you, Richard _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
