On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 10:39:15AM +0400, Sergey Matveychuk wrote: > Gábor Kövesdán wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I am pleased to announce, that portmgr committed my patch for ports > > infrastructure DESTDIR support today. Note that this support is only for > > Thanks for your work. It's highly appreciated. > The feature was discussed for years but no real progress had been done. > > But a little number of ports will respect DESTDIR out of box. Some ports > can be easily converted, for some ports it will be a hard work and a few > ports will never be done. > > So, a question still arise: how could we warn user a port does not > respect DESTDIR if he've defined it? > > E.g. we could use DESTDIR_READY=yes in a port Makefile if it's tested > with DESTDIR. > I prefer to turn that logic around, but a run on pointyhat will have to confirm how the number of working and non-working ports are. I am hoping that most ports just DTRT, so we can mark the rest NO_DESTDIR or similar. But yes, such a mechanism has to be worked on.
-erwin -- Erwin Lansing http://droso.org Security is like an onion. (o_ _o) It's made up of several layers \\\_\ /_/// [EMAIL PROTECTED] And it makes you cry. <____) (____> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpkpRSGICxu5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
