In Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> NAKATA Maho wrote: > > In Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> I recently added logic to portmaster to handle this kind of situation > >> transparently for the user. A more general solution to this part of the > >> problem could be had by improving the logic in the 'make checksum' target. > >> OTOH, your solution would break the logic that portmaster (and I believe > >> portupgrade also) uses to detect and delete stale distfiles. > > > > It seems that I should not say something about such kind of issue. > > Why not? You certainly won't offend me. :) I thought that such kind of political issue must be handeled by portmgr, and IMHO original idea, retaining DISTFILE uniqueness is a good one. and I'm not violating the rule of FreeBSD ports system, since I sufficiently explained at commit log. But I don't want to implement this :) thanks, -- NAKATA, Maho ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
