On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 01:11:15AM +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > On 5/13/07, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 01:00:51AM +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > >> Reporting success on one of my desktops. It's a current/i386 > >> box with a little over 1000 packages (after the upgrade). > >> > >> I used portupgrade-devel, but started with stale INDEX. For > >> this reason or not, I stumbled upon the libXft quirk. Stopped > >> the upgrade when I saw a few pkg_create's to take far too > >> long because of dependency loop, rebuilt the INDEX with > >> "make index" (portsdb -U didn't work for me), ran pkgdb -F > >> and after that portupgrade -a finished without any major > >> surprises. > > > >Can you confirm that you started by doing portupgrade -Rf libXft and > >it still gave the dependency loop? > > Nope, I actually misread UPDATING and thought portupgrade-devel > didn't need it. [ try s/nor/not/ in the message :) ]
OK, that's precisely the expected failure mode then :) > >> mergebase.sh failed, probably because my system is quite > >> dirty. Even after I removed the conflicting files, it just > >> failed. I've made the merge myself and been living happily > >> ever since (so far). > > > >Hmm, would be nice to know why. > > I'll try to look closer at it on my laptop. Something tells > me it'll fail there too, because it's my development system > and it's as dirty as it gets. Running sh -x will help. Kris _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
