Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:


On Sun, 20 May 2007, Doug Barton wrote:

Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Quoting Stephen Montgomery-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Sat, 19 May 2007 23:48:52 -0500):

On my system, the program pkg_version can double its speed simply by replacing "make -V PKGNAME" by "make BEFOREPORTMK=yes -V PKGNAME"

This is very cool! I've already added it to my devel version of portmaster in several places. I call make a LOT in portmaster, so I went through every invocation and added this wherever it worked (i.e., didn't cause a difference in (or absence of) output.


However just because it works in a majority of cases doesn't mean that it will work all the time. You just don't know what important thing might be in AFTERPORTMK, which 99% of the time you never need.

So I see two approaches:

1. Add more .if's to bsd.port.mk so that there is a more efficient "make VARIABLEONLY=yes -V variable-name" that does all the variables, but doesn't calculate any of the targets - this might make things a bit faster, or it might not;

I don't think this will speed things up. I hacked into the code for make, putting conditionals so that when the "-V" flag was set, that make wouldn't bother to calculate targets or dependencies or creations, but only variables.


2. Profile bsd make and see if there are any bottlenecks. I bet make was never designed for speed in these kinds of situations. But this would be a long term project, albeit definitely worth doing.

It looks to me like the variables are stored as a linear list in the "make" program. Thus if you have something like 500 variables (e.g. try a "make -d g1 -V XX | grep = | wc -l" in a port) it is going to take quite some time to search through all the variables to find one. This is especially a problem for variable assignments using "?=" which first has to search to see if the variable is already defined. And there are a lot of "?=" in bsd.port.mk, 298 of them. I haven't done any profiling yet, but I bet that this is what is taking up all the time. Probably the way to solve this is to rewrite src/usr.bin/make/var.c so that it uses some more sophisticated way of storing the variables - maybe Berkeley databases is the way to go. I almost get the feeling that if make were completely rewritten in perl that it would go faster!

_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to