On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 01:34:08AM +0800, Rong-En Fan wrote: > On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 05:31:49PM +0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > ** The following ports have a version number that sorts before a previous > > one ** > > > > For many package tools to work correctly, it is of utmost importance that > > version numbers of a port form a monotonic increasing sequence over time. > > Refer to the FreeBSD Porter's Handbook, 'Package Naming Conventions' for > > more information. Tools that won't work include pkg_version, portupgrade > > and portaudit. A common error is an accidental deletion of PORTEPOCH. > > > > Please fix any errors as soon as possible. > > As I noted in commit log, this port is just repocopied and not > connected to build. The is intentional.
If it is not connected to the build then how is it showing up here? I thought the script used INDEX builds for comparison. Kris > > Regards, > Rong-En Fan > > > The ports tree was updated at Sat Jul 21 2007 16:32:01 UTC. > > > > - *net-p2p/azureus2* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: azureus2-2.5.0.4 < azureus-3.0.1.6 > > | revision 1.46 > > | date: 2007/07/21 03:12:36; author: rafan; state: Exp; lines: +4 -5 > > | - Downgrade to 2.5.0.4. No PORTEPOCH is required since this port was > > just > > | copied from net-p2p/azureus and it's not connected to build yet. > > | > > | PR: ports/114486 > > | Submitted by: Robert Noland <rnoland at 2hip.net> > > > > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
