-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Ade Lovett wrote: > > On Dec 03, 2007, at 10:12 , Aryeh M. Friedman wrote: >> I have about 20 responses in private email and only the ones you >> have seen in public are in this category > > Enough said. There are currently ~180 people with direct access to > the ports/ tree (ie: ports committers).
Only 2 are self-reported maintainers and at least 5 admit to not being maintainers... I think your main issue is you are 100% in "there is nothing wrong" camp and for what ever reason want to convience everyone else any effort to say/do differently is misguided. > > Even assuming all private email responses came from committers, > that's an 11% hit rate. That is why I am planning to wait to the end of Dec. or so to report the results in detail (and widen the audiences/forums) > > Which part of "statistically invalid" is not getting through here? A self-selected sample will never be "statically" valid *BUT* it can be informative about what people are thinking. - -- Aryeh M. Friedman FloSoft Systems Developer, not business, friendly http://www.flosoft-systems.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHVEm5358R5LPuPvsRAk4zAJ90UYdW0jfTCyxwlAXDRd2Uf58uPACfbmpS 1NG3/ziaCXuf/4GFBxKRIQ8= =KUFV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
