On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 12:11 PM, Benjamin Lutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This patch has been sitting in GNATS for a couple of months now: > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/113132 > > I've received a few mails from people reporting success, and none > reporting that bad things have happened. Is it possible to get this > committed?
It needs to go through an experimental build first. IMHO, this is an ugly hack. Ultimately, we're talking about marking almost 20k ports as parallel-safe. Why not taking the opposite approach? Allow it by default, figure out which ports break and why, fix where possible? -- Florent Thoumie [EMAIL PROTECTED] FreeBSD Committer _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
