On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 06:34:54PM +0200, Pietro Cerutti wrote:
> I definitely do not agree. Please note that a pointer is not required to
> fit into a long, while it is required to fit into a size_t.
I do not think that C99 requires the size_t to be capable of holding
the pointer. size_t is only required to hold result of sizeof.

It is intptr_t type that shall do it.

Attachment: pgp62UZ6MQC1r.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to