On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 06:40:15PM -0500, M. L. Dodson wrote: > I am the maintainer of biology/nab and asked that it be marked > deprecated several months ago. I just filed a PR to have it removed. > > Nab has been superseded by AmberTools (also by the nab developers). I > have the current version of AmberTools building with no problems from > within a skeleton port. The problem (and I do not see any solution) > is that AmberTools assumes that it will be built in its final > installed location. This location is hardwired throughout the > compiled code. The build process fails spectacularly if you specify > some other location, then move the built code and data. > > Is there some secret method to handle such ports for which I do not > possess the magical decoder ring? Any help would be appreciated.
What a very odd build system... Could you attach the port, so I/we can have a look at this AmberTools (and it's build system). -- Martin Tournoij [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.daemonforums.org QOTD: You will have long and healthy life. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
