On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 12:17:53PM +0200, Klaus Espenlaub wrote: > Hi, > > Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: > >On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 3:22 PM, Klaus Espenlaub <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>#include <disclaimer> > >I speak for myself and nobody else. I do not claim that I in any way > >represent FreeBSD. > >>freebsd is yet another kernel for which the VirtualBox devs would have > >>to figure out how to safely achieve a few things normal applications > >>don't ever need. Like dealing with physical memory, getting along with > >>the scheduler and stuff like that. It's also true that the written > >>documentation in VirtualBox about this area leaves something to be > >>desired - again a manpower problem. > >It is easy for me as an outsider to see that this can be viewed from > >the opposite angle: > >"VirtualBox is just another virtualization solution for FreeBSD. We > >are sorry that the VirtualBox team can't find any time to provide the > >necessary documentation. Currently FreeBSD don't have any developers > >with enough free time to figure things out from the documentation > >available now. You see - it is simply a manpower problem."
I think you could better ask for help on [EMAIL PROTECTED] as there aren't too many kernel developers reading ports@ is guess.
pgpHcsBd680hn.pgp
Description: PGP signature
