On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 06:57:50PM +0200, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:07:41 +0100 > Guido Falsi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 06:52:28PM +0200, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > > > > Hi! > > > > > > > > QAT reported me a problem with my port on AMD64. > > > > > > > > here is the report: > > > > > > > > http://t64.tecnik93.com/logs/7-STABLE-FTP/traindirector-3.5.log > > > > > > > > I tried it on my machines but I can't see any problem on i386, it > > > > looks like and AMD64 problem. > > > > > > > > Could someone with some amd64 hardware help me a little? > > > > > > > > I'd like to know, if you have wxgtk installed, what it is > > > > installing exactly, could someone send me the +CONTENTS file for > > > > the wxgtk2-unicode-* package? > > > > > > Grab the packages from here: > > > http://t64.tecnik93.com/packages/7-STABLE-FTP/ > > > > Hi again. > > > > I checked the plist, which states the file QAT can't find should be > > there. > > > > I went on to install FreeBSD-amd64 on a spare PC at work and tried > > compiling the port and it works like a charm. I can't really reproduce > > the problem. > > > > How should I proceed? Any help would be appreciated. Thank you. > > > > I don't want to blame it on QAT, but if I can't test the problem I > > really don't know how to fix it. > > I'll test it again on an other amd tinderbox. Please allow me until > tomorrow for that.
I tested this on an AMD64 tinderbox of my own and I duplicated the same failure seen by the QAT. Are you building everything with the same flags as used by QAT? The three important ones that I know QAT uses are: NOPORTDOCS NOPORTEXAMPLES NOPORTDATA I don't see how these could have an impact on your testing but I'm just throwing it out there. -- WXS _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
