On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 03:54:18 -0500, Alex Dupre <a...@freebsd.org> wrote:
Using the full path will not work too well either with different
LOCALBASEs
though I guess one could check /usr/local, $PREFIX, and $LOCALBASE and
consider that good enough.
I think ${LOCALBASE}/bin/gcc295 would be enough. As you say, gcc295 is
dying, while ccache is actively used. It's quite annoying to remove such
check from the Makefile, while I doubt anyone is still going to compile
gcc43 with gcc295 installed in a non-standard location.
Yes, I agree about that ${LOCALBASE}. Either put full path or remove
gcc295 sound good to me.
Cheers,
Mezz
--
me...@cox.net - m...@freebsd.org
FreeBSD GNOME Team
http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gn...@freebsd.org
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
