* Glen Barber (glen.j.bar...@gmail.com) wrote: > > So, what do we do? May I commit the patch (+portmgr)? I believe this to > > be the best solution (even if a temporary one if we'll be able to > > resolve things with SF) as it will be clear which port uses the new > > scheme and there will be no variety of workarounds. > > Perhaps I've lost it in this thread, but is it only a certain amount > of ports affected? It appears the two SF ports I maintain hiccup a > bit, but are able to eventually find the distfile.
This should only affect updating SF ports to new versions. I've checked your ports, they seem to fetch just fine. -- Dmitry Marakasov . 55B5 0596 FF1E 8D84 5F56 9510 D35A 80DD F9D2 F77D amd...@amdmi3.ru ..: jabber: amd...@jabber.ru http://www.amdmi3.ru _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"